ENGLISH
2030: Core Composition II University
of Colorado-Denver, Spring
2000
|
Course Description
In this course, your goal
will be learning how to take a stand effectively in your writing. My
purpose
will be to acquaint you with various strategies for developing
argumentative
essays, to guide you through the process of an inquiry casebook, and to
encourage you toward a more fluent style of writing. As a result of
this
course, your ability to research a topic, to read critically, and to
express
your own ideas persuasively in writing within the rhetorical situation
should improve.
Required Texts
Writing Research
Papers:
A Complete Guide, James D. Lester, 9th ed. ("WRP"
henceforth)
Everything’s an Argument,
Andrea A. Lunsford, & John J. Ruszkiewicz ("EA" henceforth)
Schedule
Please complete
assignments
for the days on which they are listed.
| Week | Dates | Topic | Assignments Due |
| 1 | T 1/18 | Overview | In-Class Writing Sample |
| R 1/20 | Rhetorical Situation | read: EA 3-18 | |
| 2 | T 1/25 | Reading & Writing Arguments | read: EA 19-39 |
| R 1/27 | More Lines of Argument & Reading Visual Arguments | read: EA 43-76 & 231-238 | |
| 3 | T 2/1 | Types of Evidence & Topic Generation | read: EA 255-267 |
| R 2/3 | Finding, Evaluating, Citing Sources, & Avoiding Plagiarism | read:
EA 287-293 and WRP 83-96 skim: EA 294-318 and WRP 117-122 SA 1 due: Topic
List
|
|
| 4 | T 2/8 | Introduction to Research at Auraria Library | Meet in room 245 |
| R 2/10 | Meet for research (meet by first-floor stairs) | Look at Research Log Assignment on this schedule (on 3/14) and begin keeping track of your research efforts. | |
| 5 | T 2/15 | Meet for research (meet by first-floor stairs) | SA 2 due: Type up the publishing information on two sources you’ve found (in correct MLA format). |
| R 2/17 | Integrating Sources | due: Research
Proposal Write a short (2-page) research proposal that identifies your topic, the specific area/problem you are exploring, your interest in the topic, and what you hope to discover by researching it. In doing this, show how your topic is significant and timely. Include a description of the kinds of materials you’ve found so far and your plans for gathering future materials --> see WRP 15-21 and EA 172-198 for descriptions of research proposals. |
|
| 6 | T 2/22 | Summary & Paraphrase | read: WRP 112-115 |
| R 2/24 | Article Mapping | SA
3 due:
|
|
| 7 | T 2/29 | Source List Workshop | due: Annotated
Source List Draft Prepare a formal annotated list of the sources you have reviewed, formatted according to MLA guidelines. Include 1-2 sentences summarizing the content AND 1-2 sentences explaining your analysis/conclusion about the usefulness of each source you have reviewedà see WRP 97-99 for an example. You may choose not to use these sources in your final argument, but you should evaluate them here if you’ve looked at them. Ten (10) sources evaluated is the minimum requirement. Restrictions for your source list are as follows:
|
| R 3/2 | Position Essay Workshop & Effective Titles | due:
Position Essay draft Write a four-page essay taking a stand on an issue raised by your reading of several sources (include paraphrase/quotation evidence, documentation, and source list). Think of this essay as the first part of your argument paper. Your goal is to take a stand on your topic and present evidence to support your specific thesis. Your ideas should be developed and organized; multiple sources should be integrated into your presentation. Be clear on your audience and write for them specifically. Look at the syllabus for essay guidelines. See also WRP 145-154 for revision and editing checklists and WRP 124-126 for a thesis check. |
|
| 8 | T 3/7 | Thesis Workshop | due: Position
Essay in a folder with all materials (articles, drafts, etc.—if you
used a book, please copy the page you paraphrase or quote and include
it
so I can check your documentation).
SA 4 due: Thesis (you don’t have to rework your position essay thesis, just type on a page and exclude your name). |
| R 3/9 | Logical Fallacies/Refutation | read:
EA 268-280
SA 5 due: Detailed
Outline |
|
| 9 | T 3/14 | Refutation Workshop | due: Research
Log Keep track of your research efforts from Feb. 10 through March 9. Note your activities and your reactions to what you are finding (ideas, thoughts, frustrations, triumphs, etc., on the research process as well as on the materials you are reading). Do this in journal form, with as many entries as you see fit (at least two per week is the minimum). Note: this log should be something you do as you go along, so that for today, you simply turn it in (that’s why I have another assignment for this day). due: Refutation
Essay
draft |
| R 3/16 | due: Refutation Essay in a folder with all drafts. | ||
| 10 | T 3/21 | Spring Break! | |
| R 3/23 | Spring Break! |
2030 Schedule
| Week | Dates | Topic | Assignments Due |
| 11 | T 3/28 | due: Revised Position Essay paperclipped to the Position Essay I put notes on (you may keep your other draft materials and articles for the casebook). For this version, follow the casebook template closely--make sure you have claims and evidence supporting your thesis. Incorporate your graceful refutation of 1-2 compelling points of the opposition. Because you are blending the position essay and the refutation essay together, the resulting essay will be worth 200 points (sum of both essay assignments)--it should be approximately 6 pages long. Check your quotations and paraphrases to be sure they are correct. Follow the standards for grades. Consider your audience carefully (use language that will persuade them)! | |
| R 3/30 | Introductions/Conclusions | read: WRP 133-137 and 142-145 | |
| 12 | T 4/4 | Introduction Workshop | SA
6 due: Developed Introduction
Please bring a typed page with a developed introduction that uses one of the strategies we’ve discussed in class and that leads up to your thesis. What will effectively engage the readers' attention and put them in the frame of mind to seriously consider your main idea (presented concisely in the thesis)? |
| R 4/6 | Argument (Casebook) Paper Exchange and Group Meeting | Bring 2 copies of your Argument Paper to exchange for workshop (this version should be close to final--revised to perfection, developed fully, and edited carefully). You will meet with your group members today and discuss feedback expectations. | |
| 13 | T 4/11 | Argument Paper Workshop | Bring comments for your group members! You should have at least 8 sentences of thoughtful commentary at the end (use the standards for grades and the revision and editing checklists on WRP 145-154 to guide your commentary) in addition to comments throughout the draft. |
| R 4/13 | Presentations | In
a formal ten-minute presentation characterized by good
eye contact and an appropriate speaking voice, present the
results
of your research to the class (we're interested to find out what you
discovered!).
Use an outline or notecards to organize your content, and a handout
or chart should be part of your presentation. All presentations
should
include the following:
|
|
| 14 | T 4/18 | Presentations | see guidelines above |
| R4/20 | Presentations | see guidelines above | |
| 15 | T 4/25 | Presentations | see guidelines above |
| R 4/27 | Abstract Workshop | due: Abstract Draft (two typed copies)--> see WRP 175-176. | |
| 16 | T 5/2 | due:
Final Casebooks
Casebooks should be spiral-bound. Double- or triple-check to be sure that you have included all necessary parts of the casebook. Please remember to highlight and number source materials used (and put them in the order in which they appear in your paper). Your final argumentative paper should be documented in MLA style, follow manuscript guidelines, and meet the standards of academic excellence. No late casebooks will be accepted! |
|
| R 5/4 | TBA | email assignment due (details will be given in class) | |
| TBA | Final
Exam Week Meeting: Casebooks Returned
Casebooks will not be stored in the English department. You must attend class to pick up your casebook (and final grade). |
Good Thing to Know
The Writing Center, staffed by English instructors, is a valuable resource for you. The Center operates on a walk-in basis, and the instructors can help you develop or revise your writing assignment (note: the Center is not a proofreading service). If you receive an "R" (revision required) on an essay, we will discuss your paper; then you will need to go to the Writing Center with your revised version before re-submitting the essay (have the tutor sign and date your paper when you go in). The center is located in 206 Central Classroom Building; hours are Monday 11-3, Tuesday 11-5, Wednesday 11-3, Thursday 11-3. You can also reach the Writing Center by email (writing_center@carbon.cudenver.edu) or by phone (556-4845) if you just have a quick question.
A visit to the writing center is worth 10 extra credit course points (up to five times). To receive credit, (1) please ask the writing center tutor to sign his/her name and to note the date and duration of your visit and (2) write "Writing Center Copy" across the draft discussed, then turn it in to me.
Quick Reference Guide